I have a confession to make: NU POT suporta prelucrarile moderne ale operei clasice. Le consider o blasfemie a sublimului, o tilharie, o marturie a lipsei de creativitate si de talent a unor amatori care prin intermediul facilului aspira la blazonul de artist ...
Mai mult, isi imbraca acest act josnic in straie nobile de aparatori ai libertatii de expresie ...
Mozart’s lighthearted opera The Abduction from the Seraglio does not call for a prostitute’s nipples to be sliced off and presented to the lead soprano. Nor does it include masturbation, urination as foreplay, or forced oral sex. Europe’s new breed of opera directors, however, know better than Mozart what an opera should contain. So not only does the Abduction at Berlin’s Komische Oper feature the aforementioned activities; it also replaces Mozart’s graceful ending with a Quentin Tarantino–esque bloodbath and the promise of future perversion.
Welcome to Regietheater (German for “director’s theater”), the style of opera direction now prevalent in Europe. Regietheater embodies the belief that a director’s interpretation of an opera is as important as what the composer intended, if not more so. By an odd coincidence, many cutting-edge directors working in Europe today just happen to discover the identical lode of sex, violence, and opportunity for hackneyed political “critique” in operas ranging from the early Baroque era to that of late Romanticism.
The reign of Regietheater in Europe is one of the most depressing artistic developments of our time; it suggests a culture that cannot tolerate its own legacy of beauty and nobility. Singers, orchestra members, and conductors know how shameful the most self-indulgent opera productions are, and yet they are powerless to stop them. Buoyed with government subsidies, and maintained by an informal alliance of government-appointed arts bureaucrats and critics, the phenomenon thrives, even when audiences stay away in disgust.

Bieito is the most offensive director working in Europe today. Accordingly, he is in high demand; he has mauled Verdi, Puccini, Mozart, and Richard Strauss in London, Copenhagen, Barcelona, Hanover, and numerous other venues.
Like many Regietheater directors, the Catalan Bieito piously claims to take his cues from the music itself. “I think I am very loyal to Mozart,” he notes. “There is nothing more to say.”
Actually, there is a lot more to say.
The Abduction from the Seraglio is a humorous tale of the capture of a group of Europeans by a Turkish pasha, who tries to win the love of one of them; Mozart lavishes joyful, driving rhythms—led by piccolo, triangle, and cymbals—on its Turkish themes, and adds a rich lode of elegant solos, particularly for tenor. Bieito transferred the Abduction to a contemporary Eastern European brothel and translated the dignified pasha of Mozart’s sadly irrelevant tale into the brothel’s sick pimp overseer.
To give the production’s explicit sadomasochistic sex an even greater frisson of realism, Bieito hired real prostitutes off the streets of Berlin to perform onstage. Needless to say, neither the streetwalkers nor the whippings, masturbation, and transvestite bondage are anywhere suggested in Mozart’s opera.
In one representative moment, the leading soprano, Constanze—who has already suffered digital violation during a poignant lament—is beaten and then held down and forced to watch as the pasha’s servant, Osmin, first forces a prostitute to perform fellatio on him and then gags the prostitute and slashes her to death. Osmin hands the prostitute’s trophy nipples to Constanze, who by then is retching.
Like many Regietheater directors, the Catalan Bieito piously claims to take his cues from the music itself. “I think I am very loyal to Mozart,” he notes. “There is nothing more to say.”
Actually, there is a lot more to say.
The Abduction from the Seraglio is a humorous tale of the capture of a group of Europeans by a Turkish pasha, who tries to win the love of one of them; Mozart lavishes joyful, driving rhythms—led by piccolo, triangle, and cymbals—on its Turkish themes, and adds a rich lode of elegant solos, particularly for tenor. Bieito transferred the Abduction to a contemporary Eastern European brothel and translated the dignified pasha of Mozart’s sadly irrelevant tale into the brothel’s sick pimp overseer.
To give the production’s explicit sadomasochistic sex an even greater frisson of realism, Bieito hired real prostitutes off the streets of Berlin to perform onstage. Needless to say, neither the streetwalkers nor the whippings, masturbation, and transvestite bondage are anywhere suggested in Mozart’s opera.
In one representative moment, the leading soprano, Constanze—who has already suffered digital violation during a poignant lament—is beaten and then held down and forced to watch as the pasha’s servant, Osmin, first forces a prostitute to perform fellatio on him and then gags the prostitute and slashes her to death. Osmin hands the prostitute’s trophy nipples to Constanze, who by then is retching.
[...]
Until now, New York’s Metropolitan Opera has stood resolutely against Regietheater decadence. In fact, its greatest gift to the world at the present moment is to mount productions—whether sleekly abstract or richly realistic—that allow the beauty of some of the most powerful music ever written to shine forth.
The Met’s new general manager, Peter Gelb, hit Lincoln Center last year like a comet, promising to attract new audiences by injecting more “theatrical excitement” into the house. Predicting what that would ultimately mean was difficult enough before another bombshell exploded this February: New York City Opera, the smaller company across the plaza from the Met, announced that it had hired Europe’s most prominent exponent of Regietheater as its next general manager. The shock waves at Lincoln Center still reverberate.
(Din City Journal, Aug.2007:
"The Abduction of Opera: Can the Met stand firm against the trashy productions of trendy nihilists?" Heather Mac Donald, >>> full article here...)

7 comments:
Sehe,
as fi curios sa aflu oare cum si-ar inscena Mozart operele daca ar trai azi?
In principiu sunt si io impotriva experimentelor socante dar totusi...
si ce daca esti tu curios despre ceva ce nu poate fi decit o speculatie ieftina ???
pai hai acum sa desenam si peste picturile lui MichelAngelo ...
si ce crezi tu ca ai spus prin fraza "In principiu sunt si io impotriva experimentelor socante dar totusi..." ??
adica ce dar totusi ? ti se pare ca ce e descris acolo nu e chiar atit de shockant si ca's io prea aspra cu marele artist ???
PS. ma intereseaza mai curind parerea nefestei tale ...
"In principiu sunt si io impotriva experimentelor socante dar totusi..."
Sau cum spunea Groucho Marx "Astea sant principiile mele si daca nu va plac... well, am altele".
Cand am citit prima data "Camasa lui Hristos" mi-am propus sa tin minte acea idee referitoare la neluatul in seama.
Tribunul il intreaba pe sclavul sau personal, grecul Demetrios, care fusese print intr-o cetate, daca se roaga zeilor lui pentru a se elibera si in general cam ce crede el despre multimea zeilor. Grecul era tare dezamagit de soarta lui si nu pricepea care mai este rolul zeilor in aceasta lume imperfecta, in care inocentii sufera, iar ticalosii infloresc. Surpiza mare in reactia sclavului: nici macar nu ma gandesc la ei, nu ma intereseaza sa le combat existenta.
Tanarul roman este uimit de aceasta forma maxima de dispret - a nu baga in seama. Este foarte dureros pentru cel care vrea sa se faca remarcat, in bine sau rau, sa nu i se dea nici o atentie. Acest tratament aplicat la domeniul creatiei de-a dreptul ucide.
"Este foarte dureros pentru cel care vrea sa se faca remarcat, in bine sau rau, sa nu i se dea nici o atentie. Acest tratament aplicat la domeniul creatiei de-a dreptul ucide."
... sau genereaza criminali.
ca bine zici Prinzessa...
Eu ma gandisem la uciderea ideii, dar intr-adevar un frustrat se poate da jos de pe pereti si intra in criza, cum a facut azi acela. Gelozia este criminala...
Post a Comment