Bush tells Knesset US 'stands by Israel in war on terror'
During special Knesset session in his honor, US president criticizes deadly tactics of extremist groups, denounces anti-Semitism, 'especially by those who want to wipe Israel off the map.' PM tells Bush 'future peace agreement based on your vision will be approved by this house and by the Israeli public'
by ynet reporters, 15/05/2008
"I'm honored to be here… America is proud to be Israel's closest ally and best friend in the world; our alliance is unbreakable," visiting US President George W. Bush told a special Knesset session held in his honor Thursday.
"You have worked tirelessly for peace and freedom. When Americans look at Israel we see a pioneering spirit, talent and determination of a free people refusing to let any obstacle stand in the way of their destiny," Bush said.
Bush went on to criticize the deadly tactics of extremist groups and denounced anti-Semitism, especially by those who want to wipe the nation "off the map."
"We believe that religious liberty is fundamental to civilized society, so we condemn anti-Semitism in all forms, whether by those who openly question Israel's right to exist, or by others who quietly excuse them," he said.
Bush went on to criticize the deadly tactics of extremist groups and denounced anti-Semitism, especially by those who want to wipe the nation "off the map."
"We believe that religious liberty is fundamental to civilized society, so we condemn anti-Semitism in all forms, whether by those who openly question Israel's right to exist, or by others who quietly excuse them," he said.
Bush pledged that the United States has an unbreakable bond with Israel.
"Some people suggest that if the United States would just break ties with Israel, all our problems in the Middle East would go away," the US president said in his prepared address.
"This is a tired argument that buys into the propaganda of our enemies, and America rejects it utterly. Israel's population may be just over 7 million. But when you confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because America stands with you."
During the historic address Bush also referred to the Iranian threat, saying that allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons would be an "unforgivable betrayal of future generations."
"Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the world's deadliest weapon would be an unforgivable betrayal of future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," the American leader said.
"America stands with you in firmly opposing Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions."
Bush continued to say that "in 60 years Israel will be celebrating its 120th Independence Day, the Palestinians will have their own state… Iran and Syria will be peaceful nations, Hamas, al-Qaeda and Hizbullah will be defeated, the Middle East will be a peaceful region and Israel and its neighbors will be best of friends."
Restul articolului aici.
19 comments:
"Israel's population may be just over 7 million. But when you confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because America stands with you."
----------
G.W.Bush is the best American president Israel has ever had !
several Israelis told in "A Man of Faith"
Bush continued to say that
"in 60 years Israel will be celebrating its 120th Independence Day, the Palestinians will have their own state… Iran and Syria will be peaceful nations, Hamas, al-Qaeda and Hizbullah will be defeated, the Middle East will be a peaceful region and Israel and its neighbors will be best of friends."
aici a cam luat-o razna, ametit probabil de caldura cu care a fost primit, de ovatii si dovezi de apreciere ...
vizitator, am gasit un articol interesant pe tema asta...
Is Judeo-Christian violence the same thing as Islamic violence?
by Raymond Ibrahim
Since the terrorist strikes of 9/11, Islam has often been accused of being intrinsically violent. In response, a number of apologetics have been offered in defense of the religion. The fundamental premise of almost all of these is that Islam’s purported violence — as found in Islamic scriptures and history — is no different than the violence committed by other religious groups throughout history and as recorded in their scriptures, especially Jews and Christians. The argument, in short, is that it is not Islam per se but rather human nature that is prone to violence
Draga Seherezada,
poate n-a luat-o razna.
Asa si unii in 1998 - ba chiar Ariel Sharon - cand profetic, in timpul vizitei in Israel, George W. i-a zis: "You know, Arik, it's possible that I might be president of the United States, and you might be prime minister of Israel."
Sharon, according to the observer, laughed and said it was very unlikely that he, a controversial figure in Israel politics, would become the country's prime minister.
But Sharon did, in fact, become Israel's prime minister, in a special election in Febr.2001.
Primul care a anuntzat profetic venirea lui Sharon ca PM a fost prietenul sau, ziaristul Uri Dan, care dupa ce Sharon a fost obligat sa demisioneze (vezi afacerea Sabra si Shatila) a spus:
"Cei care nu l-au voit pe Sharon ca Minsitru al Apararii, il vor primi ca PM".
Declaratzia asta a fost data cu peste 10 ani inainte de profetzia lui GWB.
Despre profetia proeminentului ziarist Uri Dan n-am stiut dar ma uimeste faptul ca cele doua profetii au fost facute in acelasi duh.
"According to Dan, George W. showed great interest in what Sharon was showing them, was a good listener and asked "thorough questions". The reporter said Bush expressed obvious admiration for what Israel had accomplished as a nation in a very short time, at one point saying to Sharon, " If you believe the Bible, as I believe the Bible, you know that extraordinary things happen".
( Era vorba de necesitatea protejarii Samariei si Iudeii - heartland biblic...)
Ref. intrebarea " Is Judeo-Christian violence the same thing as Islamic violence " a lui Ibrahim,
raspunsul meu este scurt : NUUUUUUUUUU !!!
De ce ?
Pentru ca violenta islamica este un mod de viata.
Vizitator, ... oricare ai fi tu,
Comentariul cu "Judeo-Christian Violence...", evident ca NU este al MEU,
ci o abjecta IMPERSONARE a lui Robin/California, ... care incearca sa-mi atribuie mie, adeziunea la ideile lor ...
Tu (care, dupa patos, poate ca esti o alta impersonare de-a lor ...), poti sa te edifici, dind click pe numele albastru "seherezada" si
sa vezi profilul extrem de recent (May2008), creat special pentru impersonare ...
Am eu motivele mele pentru care nu am sters acest comentariu antisemit.
felicitari vigilento! :-))))))
articolul lui raymond ibrahim a aparut pe situl lui david victor hanson. iar comentariul seherezadei numarul doi este copia unui comentariu aparut pe chatul pe mai 2007 sub prestigioasa semnatura a lui mos grigore.
tine-o tot asa! :-)))))
felicitari vigilentule ...
te-am pescuit ...!
eram sigura ca esti si tu implicat in acest "complotzel" ...
singurul lucru este ca nu stiu daca esti intr`adevar ts (de ce nu ai venit in straie albastre ??) sau esti si tu vreo impersonare ...,
desi nu cred sa aibe curajul, tu esti pentru ei o icoana la care se inchina cu adorare orgasmica ...
Tie iti spun,...
motivul pentru care nu l-am sters pe nevinovatul "ibrahim", este ca e situat chiar sub un mesaj al veritabilei ...
(si era si la inceputul cirnatului de comentarii ..., ca doar nu era sa-i pun sa faca scroll pe chat`ul cu 150 de intrari ...)
Am raportat la blogger cele 2 profile identice, si ca sa dovedesc intentia de impersonare, am dat si acest link care demonstreaza intentia de impersonare ...
dar nu va impacientati, nu se va intimpla nimica ..., experimentez si eu ...
tine-ti-o tot asa !!!
(nu uita sa iei tableta aia, si juma e buna, nu-ti mai uzi pantofii)
Shehe, Shehe,
cine-a zis ?
"despre Patrie se pot spune cuvinte scrise cu coltul inimii noastre
O, dar pentru ochiul strain
toate acestea ar fi poate dantele...
Insa pentru cei ce suntem aici
in viata, intregi si in lucrare,
cuvintele au lama de brici
intrand in miracol, cu tandra mirare."
vizitator,
eu as schimba dodii cu tine de dimineatza pina seara,
cu conditia sa fi acel vizitator care imi oferea buchetzele de flori si ciucalata ...,
dar, pentru asa ceva trebuie sa apari in albastru,
cam asa ... vizitator,
stiu ca ai acest costum, te-am vazut in el ...,
altfel, ti-o spun pe shleau,
din coltzul inimii mele ...
nu stau de vorba cu tine, oricite serenade (NS) mi-ai cinta ...
Cine a vrut sa se intrupeze in tine, s-a intrupat, cu toata rochiutza ta albastra
asa-i !
dar este detectabil.
INSA, nu isi poate permite imprastierea intregii lipse de caracter ...
intru intruparea in chiar asa de multe rochitze sau pantalonasi albastrii,
toate datind din sau dupa 16 May 2008.
se duce stocul ...
am incercat, la fel ca si mos grigore, sa aplanez conflictul asta stupid. din momentul in care (acum vreo saptamina sau doua) situatia a degenerat iremediabil, am hotarit sa nu mai scriu nimic nici aici, nici acolo.
fac o exceptie acum, doar ca sa clarific un lucru, si asta chiar ca e ultima mea aparitie ca cititor si comentator pe site-urile voastre.
pentru seherezada:
nu sint eu cel care apare aici ca "ts" (or mai fi si alte aparitii, n-am chef sa verific), nu sint implicat in nici un complotzel si nu am relatii subterane/subversive cu absolut nimeni. nici cu ei, nici cu voi. ce am de spus, spun direct. si, ca sa termin cu tine, pentru magaria (paranoia) asta o ultima vorba: esti atit de insignifianta intelectual si cultural incit nu meriti sa-ti adresez nici macar un "sa-ti fie rusine!".
p.s.
1. nu tin deloc sa apara mesajul pe blog.
2. nu ma deranjeaza daca apare.
3. inutil sa comentati. nu mai trec pe aici.
foarte bine ts,
nu trebuie sa fim toti signifianti intelectual
si ...,
habar nu am de anume ce fapte ar trebui sa-mi fie mie rusine?
cumva de parerea ta fatza de mine ?
o stiu ...,
ti-ai exprimat-o de nenumarate ori fara echivoc si cind purtai alte nume,
am vazut chiar recent una la vecini, intr-un comentariu pe care l-ai sters ...
desi parerea ta are o oarecare importantza, (fiindca din partea mea mereu a existat un interes fatza de ceea ce tu debitezi)...,
pe undeva stiu sigur ca noi 2 nu ne cunoastem.
Cu toate ca zici ca ai incercat sa aplanezi conflictul, ...
nu ai vorbit suficient de raspicat, (de ex. asa cum vorbesti cu mine)si nu ai numit drept "magarii" ceea ce fac unii inca din Nov.2007 (vorbesc doar de atacuri la "blog", nu de insulte personale care persista de peste 2 ani)
pentru cei care ti-au experimentat aplombul, incercarile tale de aplanare au fost cam timide ...
PS. nu te simti obligat sa-ti tii promisiunea.
It is not a fairy tale in which Seherezada's rags
are changed into the robes of a queen...
but rather a promise in which Seherezada in her rags
becomes more queenly.
ce pot sa zic la cele spuse de tine, anonymous,decit ca`s "deep thought..."
Dar decit sa rumeg gindurile tale, mai bine le expun aici pe cele ale lui Borges (sau despre el)...
Also within the prologue, Borges explains the need for the tale to be interesting, evoking the image of Sheherezade's narratives of the 1001 Nights.
'No aspiro a ser Esopo. Mis cuentos, como los de las Mil y Una Noches, quieren distraer o conmover y no persuadir'.
(I don't aspire to be Aesop. My tales, like the tales of the 1001 Nights, are entertaining or moving, not persuasive).
The reader, like the brutal caliph, needs to be entertained, and this becomes the prime objective of the storyteller. As a result of this need, the 'real' content of the tale becomes subordinate to its ability to engage the reader. This aspect Borges plays within an earlier tale La muerte y la brújula (Death and the Compass).
Near the beginning of the tale, the character Treviranus suggests to the protagonist, Lönrot, who is investigating a murder, the name of the possible murderer. Lönrot dismisses this hypothesis as 'posible, pero no interesante'.
As it emerges, Treviranus had been correct in his reckoning, yet by arriving at that conclusion (n.m.from the very beginning, there would have been no story ...
The need for the tales to be entertaining, regardless of their historical accuracy or authenticity is mirrored in Borges' absolute dismissal of the need for originality.
In this respect, the storyteller is perfectly at liberty to recount the tale regardless of whether he is the tale's original composer. Thus Borges claims in the prologue of El informe de Brodie that 'unos pocos argumentos me han hostigado a lo largo del tiempo; soy decidamente monótono'; (just a few plots have pursued me over the years; I'm distinctly monotonous), a detail which accounts for the repetition of themes to be encountered within his writings.
ts said ...3. inutil sa comentati. nu mai trec pe aici.
Zis-a un batran: sarea este din apa si cand se apropie de apa, se topeste si piere !
Asa si calugarul, din femeie este nascut si de se va apropia de ea, se va topi si va pieri.
Post a Comment