undivided JERUSALEM

Iata ce am citit in presa acum citeva zile:

The most amazing story in recent days has been the interview former prime minister Ehud Olmert granted Newsweek's Jerusalem bureau chief Kevin Peraino.(The interview appeared on the magazine's Web site on June 13 and in the printed edition of June 22, as "Olmert's Lament")
Olmert told Peraino that, in September 2008, he presented Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas with a proposal for a future arrangement in Jerusalem. What Olmert said specifically in this context, Peraino writes, was that "the Holy Basin of Jerusalem would be under no sovereignty at all and administered by a consortium of Saudis, Jordanians, Israelis, Palestinians and Americans..."
Newsweek reports that it received confirmation of Olmert's words from Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator. Saeb Erekat confirmed that Olmert had made the offer."It's very sad," Erekat said. "He was serious, I have to say."
Erekat said that he and Abbas studied the materials and began to formulate a response, coordinating with the Americans. But time eventually ran out.
A few months after Olmert presented his offer, war erupted in Gaza.
Shortly after that, Olmert was out of power.

Thank God for that !!
Ma gindesc deseori la soarta acestui oras, pe care il socotesc drept "una din perlele lumii". Consider ca este capitala destinata statului Israel si ca trebuie sa ramina "united" ! Mai mult, am credinta ca acel razboi absurd de 6-zile din 1967, a fost de fapt un act miraculos care a avut drept obiectiv providential, tocmai "unificarea" acestui oras in intruparea sa intiala ...

Inca de cind au inceput discutiile legate de 2-State Solutions cu tot felul de "road map for peace", sub diversele administratii, atit ale statului Israel, cit si ale USA, am simtit o senzatie de disconfort la decizia de a se lasa discutarea statutului orasului Jerusalem in ultima faza a negocietilor (in faza a III-a ...)

Din acest motiv, cu toate ca Jerusalem este capitala statului Israel
inca din 1949..., cu toate ca dupa razboiul din 1967, intregul oras Jerusalem a fost declarat de Israel drept capitala tarii prin actul numit Basic Law (1980),
iata ca palestinienii au reusit ... nu stiu cum naiba, cindva dupa 2003 (unde ? cind? cum?) sa-si insereze pretentia ca East Jerusalem sa fie capitala noului stat.

Iata si limbajul "ametit" relativ la Jerusalem (in faza a III-a), in cadrul planului sponsorat de administratia G.W.Bush in 2003, care a facut posibil acest lucru:

"Parties reach final and comprehensive permanent status agreement that ends the Israel-Palestinian conflict in 2005, through a settlement negotiated between the parties based on UNSCR 242, 338, and 1397, that ends the occupation that began in 1967, and includes an agreed, just, fair, and realistic solution to the refugee issue, and a negotiated resolution on the status of Jerusalem that takes into account the political and religious concerns of both sides, and protects the religious interests of Jews, Christians, and Muslims worldwide, and fulfils the vision of two states, Israel and sovereign, independent, democratic and viable Palestine, living side-by-side in peace and security."

De aceea mi se pare laudabil faptul ca in ultima sa cuvintare, Netanyahu a precizat acest punct, fara drept de apel !!