Doamnelor si Domnilor, ...s-ar putea ca Netanyahu sa fi avut o cina copioasa la Casa Alba. Nu se va sti niciOdata !!!!
Un articol care descrie istoricul si importanta aranjamentelor secrete in rezolvarea conflictelor din Orientul Mijlociu,
dezvaluie citeva rumori la ordinea zilei:
"Far-fetched or not, the secret deal has been and will remain a key device in the toolbox of politicians, diplomats and statesmen working in the Middle East. It will continue to throw journalists and everyday citizens off the truth's track. And, occasionally, it will help create a much-needed success for peacemakers."
"And there are rumors that Israel deals secretly with a number of Arab states regarding Iran and other issues of common interest. For most Arab leaders, confirming such information would be political poison."
"And one recently making the rounds claims that ... Obama's hard line on Israel is part of a conspiracy between the U.S. and Israel to build up Obama's pro-Arab bona fides, in order to use his increased influence in the Arab world to Israel's benefit.Deci nu doar Obama ne-a pacalit pe toti, ci chiar si Netanyahu !!
If the reports are correct, the secret deal called for Netanyahu to very publicly reject the freeze, while very quietly putting one into place through the day-to-day workings of the Jerusalem bureaucracy. That would allow him to preserve Israel's position on Jerusalem and avoid ruffling coalition feathers.
There is some evidence that this is exactly what has happened."
10 comments:
Basescu mananca la Chisinau(la Casa vinului ciorba de prepelita si costite la gratar .......
Obama si Netaniahu or fi mancat.....o oaie si doua perechi de.....fudulii delicatese.....
un ESEU interesant in care autorul explica cum a ajuns sa fie pesimist fata de MidEast Peace Process,
cu toate ca a crezut in el, cu toate ca il admira pe Obama si intelege incercarile lui ... ,
dar care conchide ca,
at least for NOW, America ar trebui s-o lase balta cu incercarile de “brokerage” ...
The False Religion of Mideast Peace... And why I'm no longer a believer,
by AARON DAVID MILLER, May/June 2010
iata si RIPOSTA la eseul de mai sus,
in care un alt autor, cu toate ca si el dezamagit de starea de lucruri ...
sustine ca USA si Israel nu pot renunta la idea de "2-state solution" si ca efortul "MidEast Peace Process" trebuie sa continue...
"Perhaps the most disheartening aspect of Miller's “cri de coeur” is its silence about the future. The situation is not static, and if there is no peace process, there will be no two-state solution.
As both Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert have warned, if there is no two-state solution, then Israel will be an apartheid state and it will face growing international censure and an internal struggle for Palestinian political rights. When that happens, Olmert noted in 2007, "the state of Israel is finished."
Reading Miller's essay, I could not help but think of Great Britain. The British did a masterful job of screwing things up in Palestine between 1919 and 1947, and then they decided the whole business was "too hard" and washed their hands of the matter. Miller is understandably unhappy with the track record of U.S. peacemaking efforts, and he is in effect throwing up his hands as well. I can understand his reaction and even sympathize with his feelings, but it's not going to make things any better. In fact, the situation is likely to get worse, and history will judge us harshly for our contribution to it. Telling President Obama to stand aside now is irresponsible advice, because we are a central player in this conflict so long as the "special relationship" continues. Standing aside now also guarantees a worse outcome for all concerned.
So here's the question I'd really like Miller to address:
if it becomes clear that "two states for two peoples" is no longer an option, what does he think U.S. policy should be? Should we then favor the ethnic cleansing of several million Palestinian Arabs from their ancestral homes, so that Israel can remain a democratic and Jewish state? (By the way, that would be a crime against humanity by any standard.)
Or should we then press Israel to grant the Palestinians full political rights, consistent with America's own "melting-pot" traditions? (That is the end of the Zionist vision, and may be unworkable for other reasons). Or should we back (and subsidize) their confinement in a few disconnected enclaves (in Gaza, around Ramallah, and one or two other areas in the West Bank), with Israel controlling the borders, airspace, and water resources? (This is the apartheid solution, and it's where we are headed now.)
I fear that some future president will have to choose between these three options, and it would be interesting to know what an experienced Middle East negotiator like Miller would advise him or her to do then."
A question for Aaron Miller
... if there is no Mideast Peace, then WHAT ??,
by Stephen M.Walt
The ECONOMIST:
The Middle East peace process: Is it really back on track?
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Robert Gibbs,
5/3/2010: I'll do one quick readout before we do Q&A here.
The President spoke late this morning with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. They discussed how best to work together to achieve comprehensive peace in the Middle East, in particularly by making full use of substantive proximity talks between Israel and the Palestinians and transitioning to direct negotiations as soon as possible. They also discussed regional challenges and the President reaffirmed his unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security.
The call took place just before noon and lasted 20 minutes.
Former Mayor Ed Koch said this morning...,
legat de Obama:
"I’m not off the bus yet, [...]
"He’s backed off of that now and I take him at his word," Koch said today. But I do feel somewhat disquieted."
Nu exista pisulean mai adorabil decit Mayor Koch ...
Ma intreb cum se va simti pisuleanul Koch cind va afla urmatorele:
Israel's ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren..., a declarat ca
President Obama never "snubbed" Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during their March 23 meeting.
According to the National Jewish Democratic Council, whose officers attended the dinner, Oren knocked down details of the snub (some reported in the media, some circulating in the kind of emails that insinuate exclamation marks into your inbox):
- There are normally no photos in such a non-state visit;
- He came in through the front door, not the back door;
- the meeting was last minute and unofficial;
- Obama did not quit Netanyahu to dine with the kids (The First Lady and the children were actually not in town);
- They worked closely and positively until late at night;
- The Prime Minister asked if he could stay to meet with his team and the White House said "of course";
- The Prime Minister asked if the President could return later to hear new ideas and he gladly did;
- They parted on good terms, etc.
Ei, da... ambasadorul Oren, care a declarat in urma cu cateva saptamani ca USA si Israel se afla intr-una din cele mai mari crize... tocmai omul care trebuie sa fie crezut.
Ma intreb, ce dracu au gasit Senatul si Camera Reprezentantilor sa o admonesteze pe Qlintoneasa... or fi visat.
Si poate tot ce a raportat presa israeliana de o discutie in sens unic in care Qlintoneasa a bombanit 45 de minute neintrerupt o fi fost o minciuna.
Iar simpaticul Obama nu a stiut de ea, adica eu sunt mic nu stiu nimic.
Si poate presa a fost invitata la intalnire dar o fi visat ca nu a fost invitata.
Nimeni nu stie ce s-a discutat !
nici la telefon, nici la intilnire.
Presa le infloreste cit pofteste..., si cea americana si cea israeliana !
Iata un articol care dezvaluie citeva distorsionari malitioase:
Don't believe all you read - except this...
"The verbal flak is coming from all directions as self-anointed insiders and experts try to shape public perceptions of the new talks before they even begin – in reality revealing little more than their own agendas. It’s not just the usual talking heads and printed pundits – everyone knows who they are – but the anonymous experts, officials, observers, insiders and assorted "reliable sources" whose identity we don’t know and whose authenticity we are unable to judge.
ONE ISRAELI paper this week headlined a story declaring: "Obama promised Abbas ... "
Post a Comment